Teresa's canonisation has
reignited criticism of her methods and her order, which detractors claim
focused on the elevation, rather than the relief, of suffering.
Critics say "grossly inadequate
medical care was given to the sick and dying, syringes were reused without
sterilisation, pain relief was non-existent or negligible and conditions were
unhygienic", reports The Guardian. On
papal orders, 1,500 homeless people were brought to Rome overnight on buses
from around Italy to be given seats of honour at the canonisation of Mother Teresa, revered around the world for
her work with the destitute and dying.
Kolkata will take a century to recover from Mother Teresa
By
IANS | Sep 03, 2016, 09.44 AM IST
If Mother Teresa,
to be canonised at the Vatican on September 4, is to be named a patron saint of
anything it should be for "misinformation". In the last 20 years of
her life, truth became an unknown entity to her. The media aided and abetted
her lack of integrity and in a way she cannot be blamed for believing in her
own lies.
Intellect was not
her strong point and, for someone like her, to be surrounded by hordes of
sycophants who were telling her if she said black was white then that had to be
true, it became intoxicating. The media did spread the mega-myth about her, but
she herself was the source. She repeatedly told the world she went around the
city 24x7 "picking up" destitute from its squalid "gutters"
(she did not), that she fed up to 9,000 in her soup kitchens (she did not), she
never refused a helpless child (she did as a rule), that the dying destitute in
her so-called home for the dying Nirmal Hriday died a "beautiful death"
(they were treated harshly and often died a miserable, painful death).
Mother Teresa was
an ultimate politician who worked on behalf of the Vatican. No, she was not an
"agent" as that would be conspiratorial. She did not have to do much
subterfuge or skulduggery in India itself, as Indians, particularly the media,
were in awe of her and connived with her.
When she said in
her Nobel speech that she created 61,237 fewer children from (slum) couples
abstaining from sex, no one challenged her on her bogus and fantastic figure;
neither did they ask her how at the height of the Cold War abortion could be
the "greatest destroyer of peace" (said a thousand times, including
in her Nobel speech).
I do not blame
world media as much as I blame Indian and particularly Kolkata media. Here she
was, a jet-setting celebrity -- although appended with the epithet "of
Calcutta" -- spending six to nine months in a year in Europe and the US,
making strange claims about her work and about the disgusting state of the
city, but never to be seen in the city's disasters -- major or minor.
Why was she not
asked why she re-used needles on her residents in Nirmal Hriday (it was
official policy) when she herself received the finest care in the world's best
hospitals?
Even after her death,
the Indian fear of blue-bordered saris continues. On August 1, 2005, UK TV
showed a child tied to a cot overnight in her orphanage -- one Kolkata
newspaper grudgingly reported the matter with lots of "alleged".
During her lifetime, even that would be unthinkable. She was white, she
hobnobbed with President Ronald Reagan (they were closest of buddies), and oh
yes, she had the Nobel -- so she had to be divine.
Did no one know
that she hobnobbed with the Duvaliers of Haiti whose brutality was unsurpassed
(whose opponents were often cut up and fed to dogs)? No one in India wanted to
know. For the Western media, she was a metaphor, a set-piece, a stratospheric
certainty of image in an uncertain and changing world. Conversely, Kolkata was
the opposite metaphor of absolute degradation where "foetuses are given to
dogs to eat" (as remarked by her "other self" Francis Goree).
It was beyond the
West's interest, energy or remit to robustly challenge these wrong stereotypes.
But did Indian journalists not know that her main bank was the Vatican Bank, a
dark cavern of corruption, intrigue and murder? Before she died, it was well
known that she had accepted millions from Charles Keating, the notorious
American swindler, but no one in India cared.
Bengalis showed
some rare guts when she was beatified through a "miracle" in 2003.
Doctors, and even the then Health Minister, made statements that Monica Besra
was cured by prolonged treatment, and not by an aluminium medal. Even Besra
herself periodically said her cure was not a miracle. But the Vatican treated
Indian opinion with the contempt it always has and proceeded with canonisation.
But what is so
great about Catholic saints? People should realise a Catholic saint does not
have to be saintly or nice in the secular sense, but has to be pure to Catholic
dogma, especially on contraception and abortion. Jose Maria Escriva, a Fascist,
is a Catholic saint; another Fascist, Cardinal Stepinac, is a
"blessed". "Saint" John Paul II actively shielded the prolific
paedophile and criminal Marcial Maciel over many years. Mother Teresa also
wrote a letter of support for a convicted paedophile priest Donald McGuire,
asking people to overlook his "imprudence".
If one looks
around Mother Teresa's homes in Kolkata today, one would find many of them
acceptable. But one must not forget that this comes after 25 years of
campaigning by me, and also persistent global criticism from Hemley Gonzalez,
the American former volunteer who in 2008 was so utterly disgusted by what he
saw that he founded the Stop the Missionaries of Charity movement and founded
his own Responsible Charity. Moreover, in the last six months the order has
spruced up a great deal, preparing for the canonisation on Sunday.
And yet, like
obliging picaninnies, the Indian government is dutifully sending a delegation
to the black-magic ceremony in Rome. (Hindus please note: the Pope is not
allowed to wish Hindus personally even on Diwali.)
Be that as it may,
my own wish would be to reclaim Kolkata/Calcutta from Teresa -- to sever the
automatic connection of the two names as the whole wide world sees it.
Kolkata's image under the yoke of Mother Teresa will take a century to recover.
In the last 50 years, the city has lost an unimaginable amount from the loss of
international business and tourism and will continue to do so. But let us at
least loudly, proudly proclaim that we have nothing to do with a medieval
creature of darkness -- not any more.
(Aroup Chatterjee,
who describes himself as a "militant atheist", is the Britain-based
author of "Mother Teresa - The untold Story", an updated version of
which was released in Kolkata in June. The views expressed are personal)
Read his post in Economic Times : Mother Teresa
No comments:
Post a Comment